In the modern world, there are numerous technological advancements which are beneficial to human kind. One such of example is mobile phone, it has became a part of the human life. Majority of people often argue that, Mobiles should be restricted in some particular places relating it to as antisocial. I partially agree to this statement, as there are pros and cons of it, which will be discussed now.
On the one hand, smart phones are quiet comparable to cigarettes as they both are addictive. Teenagers nowadays, are totally habituated to the smartphones. The use of smartphones for multiple hours can adversely affect our eyes. Moreover, using this gadget in public places can cause disturbance to the surrounding people. For instance, loud noise or ringtone in the libraries can disturb others and also, the radiation emitted by this gadget can affect the people present there. Subsequently, banning the smartphone in some places is ideal.
On the other hand, it is irrefutable that smartphones has negative effects. However, in the industrialized world with a developing technology, majority of people deal with the mobile phones right from the day to night. That is to say these are essential in our day-to-day lives. Not only this phenomenon provide numerous academic knowledge, social and valuable information, but also had been encouraging to reduce unemployement by creating multitude of oppurtunities like youtube and tiktok. Moreover, in today's scenario almost most of the jobs involve the smartphones, making it unavoidable.
In conclusion, Although, there are multiple issues with the smartphones, banning and regarding it as antisocial is not ideal, because human lives work parallel with the smartphones making it essential in our day-to-day lives.
- When choosing a job the salary is the most important consideration To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Some children nowadays take sports seriously while others play sports in their free time Is this a positive or negative development Give your own opinion and examples 84
- The chart shows the water levels of 6 cities in Australia Darwin 1 Sydney 2 Melbourne 3 Brisbane 4 Perth 5 and Canberra 6 in October 2009 and October 2010 73
- People today generally have better lives than people in the past did To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The use of mobile phone is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phone should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 148, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...such of example is mobile phone, it has became a part of the human life. Majority of p...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, so, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38489208633 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01944297308 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.60071942446 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3130544962 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5625 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9375 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150547613025 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.045528490924 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0467576846156 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851612490876 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401881999201 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.36 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.