There are two graphs, the upper bar graph shows the the the Country origin of the films and groups them into Australian, UK US and Other that has been shown in theaters UK and Australia in year 2001 and the bottom line graph compares the cinema audiences in millions between 1975 to 2005 in Uk and Australia. Overall in year 2001 US films outnumbers the total of other countries in both Australia and UK, and from 1985 and on there is a increasing trend of audiences in both UK and Australia.
Graph a depicts that in year 2001 in Australia 65 per cent of films are made in US which followed by others category with 18 per cent. Both UK and Australian films comprises less than 10 per cent, in contrast, In UK vast majority of films are produced in US reaching 75 percent. Uk films are presenting the second group with reaching 20 percent.
When we look at second graph which provides us information about the number of audiences, cinema viewers in UK started from 100 millions and reached 120 millions in year 1977 and went down to 60 million in1985 where it makes its nadir. In contrast to this in Australia, although the number of audiences were far less than UK, it followed a quite steady state till 1985 between 20 to 40 million. From 1985 and on there is an increasing trend of audiences in both countries where it ended with 160 millions in UK and 80 million in Australia.
To sum up there is a major dominancy of US films in both countries and although the audiences in UK surpasses Australia there is an increasing trend of cinema admissions in both countries for the last 20 years.
- It is better to eat food which is produced locally by small farmers, rather than food produced by ‘factory farming’ and transported long distances.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? 51
- In some countries young people are encouraged to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies. Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- The water use in 2000 by six countries in the Middle East 51
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 56
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...e two graphs, the upper bar graph shows the the the Country origin of the films and gro...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 49, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...e two graphs, the upper bar graph shows the the the Country origin of the films and gro...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...o graphs, the upper bar graph shows the the the Country origin of the films and groups ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 53, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...o graphs, the upper bar graph shows the the the Country origin of the films and groups ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 350, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Overall in year 2001 US films outnumbers the total of other countries in both Aus...
^^
Line 1, column 437, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...a and UK, and from 1985 and on there is a increasing trend of audiences in both U...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...of audiences in both UK and Australia. Graph a depicts that in year 2001 in Aus...
^^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
... films are made in US which followed by others category with 18 per cent. Both UK and ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 212, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n both countries for the last 20 years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
look, second, in contrast, in contrast to, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 6.8 221% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 55.0 33.7804878049 163% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 291.0 196.424390244 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.51202749141 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.73543355544 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49285655301 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.460481099656 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 368.1 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.3414583005 43.030603864 152% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.888888889 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.3333333333 22.9334400587 141% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 1.69756097561 530% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242842887776 0.215688989381 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118178616376 0.103423049105 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620697153178 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163187521352 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640835755459 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.38 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.47 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.