The charts below describe the numbers of people per household in 1995 and 2005 of an European country
The pie charts illustrate the percentage of families with one person in 1995 and 2005 of an Ẻuopean nation
In general, there were a noticeable decrease in the proportion of families having one person, 2 people, 3 people, 4 people, while an upward trend can be seen if we look at the figures for 5 people and 6 people. It is also clear that the figure for 2 people was the highest among six groups in 1995; however, that for 3 people was larger than for any other in 2005.
At the beginning of the period, 31% of households had 2 people, compared to only 20% with 3 people and 6% with 1 person. Over the following 10 years, The UK saw the percentage of households having one person drop to 3%. During the same period, the proportion of families having 2 people fell slightly; however, the figure for 3 people increased sharply to 35%.
In 1995, families with 4 members accounted for 18% of the total households, while the figures for 6 people and 5 people were lower, at 17% and 8%. After 10 years, the percentage of households with 4 people dropped to 17%, and that for 6 people fell to 2%. On the other hand, the proportion of families with 6 people increased considerably, reaching 13%.
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are more common than small local shops Is this a negative or positive development 56
- In many places the role of mother and father is changing Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- Some people say that people should have a different amount of holidays according to their job To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- The graph shows information about types of accommodation of people on holiday in the UK 1985 1995 and 2005 84
- The plan below shows a city in 1950 and the city now 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to 17%, and that for 6 people fell to 2%. On the other hand, the proportion of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 976.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45662100457 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58168201873 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497716894977 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.0834735821 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.375 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.185487273371 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918196701917 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0334805968398 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136890181478 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343986428599 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 69.45 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.