The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010.
The bar chart and pie charts illustrate the percentages of layman in Glasgow having different levels of education in the year 2010. Information is divided into five different age groups in bar chart and by gender in the pie charts.
Overall, the maximum number of people with university education were in younger age groups, while in the retiree people most of them did not have qualifications. The proportions of men and women were simmilar and it's showed minor different between the level of education.
The percentage of mankind with university education is approximately three quartes in the young-age; people and it's reduced in the later age group and steay at 50% in the 50-75 age groupsand just 25% in the last age groups. In the contrast no qualification is just 9% in first 3 age groups and that value increased to 30% in the 50-75 age also, escalation to 72% for over 75 ages.
The proportion of men and women in each section of education was nearly a third portion and only slightly changes about 3% in university graduates and people who do not have any degrees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | Molor-Od | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | Vrajesh | 78 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Hira Shaheen | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-07 | Hira Shaheen | 11 | view |
| 2019-11-16 | Moto | 73 | view |
- The charts below give information about levels of education in Glasgow, a city in Scotland, in 2010. 78
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- An increasing number of professionals, such as doctors and teachers, are leaving their own poorer countries to work in developed countries. What problems do this cause? What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation? 84
- The pie charts show the electricity generated in Germany and France from all sources and renewables in the year 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 903.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 187.0 196.424390244 95% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82887700535 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.69794460899 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74459217044 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582887700535 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 277.2 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.342917847 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 112.824112599 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.7142857143 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14955217515 0.215688989381 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0815117469685 0.103423049105 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935842836288 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0992580670951 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927081357788 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.