The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008.
The bar charts illustrate the percentages of males and females getting married, divided into six different age groups in one country in the year 1996 and 2008.
Overall, females got married at a younger age than males. It is also clear that the average age for marrying was 25-29 for women and 30-39 for men.
Only 1% of women from 16 to19 was married in 1996, followed by a drop to a relatively small percentage in 2008, whereas no men got married at this age. Women between 20 and 24 accounted for 6% which was higher than that of the 30-35 age group, at 4%, after which both figures decreased almost twofold to 3% and just over 2% respectively. The percentages of females aged 25 to 29 (just under 12%) and 40 to 44 (2%) remained unchanged over the 12-year period. At the same time, there was a slight rise from 7% to 8% in females from 30 to 34.
In terms of males’ figures, there was no significant change regarding 20-24 year-olds stabilizing at about 2% in both 1996 and 2008. The figures for men at the age of 25 to 29 and 40 and over witnessed a slight drop to 8% for the former and nearly 3.5% for the latter in 2006. Finally, starting at 9%, the proportion of men aged 30 to 34 showed an increase of 3% in 2008. A similar trend can be seen for the 35-39 group, rising from 7% to over 11%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-16 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-06 | denistran85 | 73 | view |
| 2022-06-09 | Hai Anh Phan Thi | 42 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 47 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 73 | view |
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works 73
- The bar chart below shows the amount of money invested in each category from five organisations 78
- You are attending a course at an evening school Write a letter to the director of the school with a complaint about the course In your letter you should Describe the course you are taking Explain what you don t like about the course Give your opinion abou 78
- SOME PEOPLE THINK THAT THE BEST WAY TO REDUCE CRIME IS TO GIVE LONGER PRISON SENTENCES OTHERS HOWEVER BELIEVE THERE ARE BETTER ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF REDUCING CRIME DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 89
- The table illustrates the percentage of male and female in terms of weight in Vietnam from 1999 to 2009 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, if, regarding, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1058.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 249.0 196.424390244 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.24899598394 4.92477711251 86% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35585218456 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546184738956 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6148603263 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.1818181818 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6363636364 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17065808329 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0775840865691 0.103423049105 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726256925336 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132762213775 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0528504264535 0.0819641961636 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.67 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.