The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare three distinct age in term of the proportion of population in Italy and Yemen in two different years.
It is clear that Yemen had the younger population in the year 200, and that the same is predicted for the year 2050. The population of both countries are expected to age over the fifty-year period.
In year 2000, the percentage of the population aged 14 or under of Yemen was almost fourfold higher than the figure for Italy, at 50.1% and 14.3% respectively. While most Italian (61.6%) fell into the 15-59 age group, only 46.3% of the inhabitants of Yemen. The proportion of people aged 60 or over of Italy was exponentially higher than the figure for Yemen, at 24.1% and 3.6% respectively.
By 2050, the percentage of children under 15 is predicted to drop in both countries, reaching 37.0% in Yemen and 11.5% in Italy. On the other hand, the biggest change is seen in the proportion of elderly people in Italy where the figure is expected to peak at 42.3% and only raising by 2.1% in Yemen. Finally, it is anticipated that the 15 to 59 age group will jump by around 10% in Yemen but shrink by around 15% in Italy.
- The charts below give information on the ages of the population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is more important to learn about local history than foreign history. To what extent do you agree or disagree?Wrire at least 250 words. 61
- The chart below shows the total number of minutes (in billions) of telephone calls in the UK, divides into three categories, from 1995-2002.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 942.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55072463768 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52689793828 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512077294686 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.5832027165 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.666666667 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208148770924 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0937528927625 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0361667176284 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135699091059 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0224373445701 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.