The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050
The pie charts provided compare Yemen and Italy in terms of the proportion of three different age groups in 2000 and 2050. Overall, what stands out from these charts is that the youngest age group will experience a significant decrease in both countries, while there will be a considerable increase in populations of older ages in these two countries in 2050.
Looking at Yemen, 0 to 14 year olds accounted for the vast majority of the total population in 2000, with 50.1%, while people with the age of 60 or older were only a tiny minority, at 3.6%. However, the percentage of the youngest age group is predicted to plunge to 37.0%, whereas people who are between 15 and 59 years old will exhibit significant growth to 57.3% in 2050. The oldest age group will have a slight increase of 2.1% 50 years later.
Focusing on Italy, the largest age group consisted of 15 to 59 year olds in 2000, with 61.6%. In second place was the oldest age bracket, with just less than a quarter of the total, 24.1%. The remaining 14.3% was made of the youngest age group. In contrast, the oldest people will witness a sharp rise in proportion, with 42.3%, becoming the leading age group of the nation in 2050. On the other hand, the figure for the group with 15 to 59 years will drop drastically to 46.2%. There will also be a decline in the percentage of the youngest population to 11.5% in 2050.
- Some people think that it is fine for professional sportsmen and sportswomen to misbehave on or off the field as long as they are playing well To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The table below shows the sales at a small restaurants in a downtown business district 55
- A country becomes more interesting and develops more quickly when its population includes a mixture of nationalities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays we are producing more and more rubbish Why do you think this is happening What can governments do to help reduce the amount of rubbish produced 70
- Some people think that we live in a society where money and possessions are given too much importance Others believe that this is improving our lives Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, second, so, whereas, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 248.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55241935484 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4328086942 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528225806452 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 319.5 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.2511591462 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.636363636 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.54545454545 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239271477344 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103406809065 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0735695763716 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188907337536 0.15604864568 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061971497896 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.41 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.