The given pie charts depict some data about proportions of diverse age groups in Yemen and Italy and a demographic prediction about them.
Looking from an overall perspective, the majority of both nations were adults in 2000, while amongst the next 50 years a dramatic growth will occur in the number of elderlies.
In 2000, half of the population in Yemen referred to the children under 15 years by 50.1%. In this year the next largest group of individuals were adults by 46.3%. In 2000, seniors made up only 3.6% of the population. The prediction about this country reveals that in 2050, more than half of the population will be with adults by 57.3%, whereas the amount of children will drastically decrease and 37% of pie chart allocate to this age group. Finally by a little growth in the number of persons 60 years or older, they will reach 5.7%.
By glancing at the pie chart of Italy in 2000, it is clear that the huge amounts of society were between 15 to 59 years by 61.6% while this percent will change to 46.2% in 2050. About a quarter of the population was made up of elderlies in 2000 and this magnitude by a significant rise will reach 42.3% in 2050. The number of under 15 years by 14.3% in 2000, will not experience any remarkable change during the next 50 years and after half a century with a slight decrease will be 11.5%.
- In some areas of the us a curfew is imposed in which teenager are not allowed to be out doors after a particular time at night unless they are accompanied by an adult what is your opinion about this 89
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 84
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- The maps below shows the town of Lynnfield in 1936 and then later in 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that public health within a country can be improved by government making laws regarding nutritious food Others however think that health is a matter of personal choice and responsibility Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...up of individuals were adults by 46.3%. In 2000, seniors made up only 3.6% of the ...
^^
Line 5, column 444, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...f pie chart allocate to this age group. Finally by a little growth in the number of per...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, look, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 1.00243902439 798% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 244.0 196.424390244 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5368852459 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95227774224 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39446348653 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504098360656 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4374865912 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.7 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.118020819079 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0557987967175 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410100790299 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0786738672364 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327202623247 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.35 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.