The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant.
The charts illustrated the detail of age groups of people from Yemen and Italy in the years 2000 and 2050.
Overall, Italy had older populations than Yemen but according to prediction in 2050, the number of older people in both countries increased evidently. In comparison, Yemen was younger nation than Italy according to provided proportions.
When it comes to downswings, The under teenager age of Yemen comprised the figures as threefold as Italy's over the period which accounted for 50,1%, 37% compared to 14,3% and 11,5% respectively. In contrast, the 60+ years group in Yemen had a slight growth from 3,6% at the beginning to 5,7% in the final year, while there was an enormous rise nearly 2 times from 24,1% to 42,3% in Italy's same age.
When it comes to upswings, teenager and adult age sectors in Yemen saw a stable increase approximately 10% over 50 years, while similar segments of Italy decreased significantly from 61,6% to 46,2%.
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 56
- The pie charts below show information on the highest level of education of women in Someland in 1945 and 1995.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the two graphs below.» You should write at least 150 words. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 56
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development. 61
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 word 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 791.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.9748427673 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68830958509 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622641509434 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 230.4 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5367238497 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.833333333 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18927042226 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.104155166747 0.103423049105 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513981832984 0.0843802449381 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127742904963 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05470141838 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 62.01 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.