Divorce rates in Finland and Sweden.
The bar charts illustrated the percentages of divorces in Finland and Sweden between 2011 and 2015.
Overall, Sweden experienced more divorce cases than Finland over the period, but the last year the broken couples in Finland were more popular. it showed much the mindset of married people in this nation was adjusted.
when it comes to the period of 2011 to 2012, starting from 37% at the beginning the figure of divorce in Finland dropped slightly to 33% in the next year. In contrast, the number of divorce in Sweden from 44% climbed to a peak at nearly 50% in 2012 which as one and a half times as the other.
when it comes to the remain times, there was a profound growth in cases of Finland from 33% in 2012 to 41% in 2015, while we saw a slight decrease in Sweden's proportion from 50% in 2012 to 44% in 2014 before dropped sharply to 37% in the last year.
- The government should invest more money in teaching science than in other subjects for a country s development and progress To what extent do you agree or disagree 76
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 56
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 word 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, an make comparisions where relevant. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 145, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...n couples in Finland were more popular. it showed much the mindset of married peop...
^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ied people in this nation was adjusted. when it comes to the period of 2011 to 2...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... people in this nation was adjusted. when it comes to the period of 2011 to 2012,...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
...as one and a half times as the other. when it comes to the remain times, there wa...
^^^^
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... times as the other. when it comes to the remain times, there was a profound growth in ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 35, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...er. when it comes to the remain times, there was a profound growth in cases of ...
^^
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...wth in cases of Finland from 33% in 2012 to 41% in 2015, while we saw a slight de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 705.0 965.302439024 73% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.37888198758 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.24882464832 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540372670807 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 198.0 283.868780488 70% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.4396568853 43.030603864 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.5 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8333333333 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.83333333333 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307502420143 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.167683165765 0.103423049105 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.11201431214 0.0843802449381 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217268429138 0.15604864568 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0823468478373 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.42 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.