The three pie charts illustrate the mean proportion of three different types of nutrients consumed by US residents in their daily meals, the overconsumption of which can have detrimental effects on health.
Overall, it is apparent that the percentage of sodium and saturated fats are the highest in dinner while the opposite is true for breakfast. Additionally, it is clear that American citizens prefer to use a high portion of added sugar in their snacks.
In detail, dinner and lunch contain the highest proportions of both sodium (43% for dinner and 29% for lunch) and saturated fat (37% for dinner and 26% for lunch). In contrast, the figures for added sugar are much lower for these two meals, with 23% and 19% respectively.
On the other hand, while they prefer to use the same amount of sodium in their breakfast and snacks (14%), saturated fats differ by only 5%. However, in terms of added sugars, a considerable disparity can be seen in the figures for snack and breakfast, 42% for the former and only 16% for the latter.
- The following appeared in a newspaper article about law firms in the city of Megalopolis In Megalopolis the number of law school graduates who went to work for larger corporate firms declined by 15 over the last three years whereas an increasing num 68
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of a Batavia newspaper The department of agriculture in Batavia reports that the number of dairy farms throughout the country is now 25 percent greater than it was 10 years ago During this same time period 69
- The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below shows the number and the purpose of trips made by men and women in a certain European country in 2007 68
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 854.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79775280899 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64482067053 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578651685393 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 250.2 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.1801873252 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4285714286 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.71428571429 5.23603664747 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0548821230966 0.215688989381 25% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0287413914673 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0431930915637 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0438189834437 0.15604864568 28% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504424315667 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.