the charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three fupes of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The 3 given pie charts illustrate the percentages of nutrients being used in common servings including breakfast, dinner, lunch and snacks. It also needs to be pointed out that each chart is for an unhealthy substance as sodium, saturated fat and added sugar.
Overall, in all three charts dinner allocates an eye-catching share which in sodium and saturated fat it has the highest contributor percentage. However, breakfast in three charts is allocating somehow the same amount and they are relatively low.
To begin with, the contribution of dinner to sodium chart is 43% and in saturated fat it has a 6%. lower percentage as 37%. In addition, the lowest nutrient for dinner is added sugar standing at 23%. Whereas, the snacks category has lower percentage by 14% and 21% in sodium and saturated fat respectively, the added sugar surged drastically turning 42% that this percentage is even higher than other servings.
On the other hand, breakfasts saturated fat and its added sugar have equal share by 16% and by 2% decrease the contribution of sodium would get reached. It is worth considering that lunch sodium share is 29% and also a deterioration of 3% determine the saturated fat percentage of this meal. 19% is indeed the added sugar of mentioned serving.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-30 | Sarina2021 | 67 | view |
- the pie charts below show the percentage of five kinds of books sold by booksellers between 1972 and 2012 summarize the information by selecting and reporting main features and make the comparisons where relevent 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 70
- The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the years 1996 to 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- In future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- The tables below show how many international students study in Canada and the United States by country of origin Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The 3 given pie charts illustrate the pe...
^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sodium, saturated fat and added sugar. Overall, in all three charts dinner allo...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me amount and they are relatively low. To begin with, the contribution of dinne...
^^^
Line 3, column 102, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Lower
...s 43% and in saturated fat it has a 6%. lower percentage as 37%. In addition, the low...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 216, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'snacks'' or 'snack's'?
Suggestion: snacks'; snack's
...ded sugar standing at 23%. Whereas, the snacks category has lower percentage by 14% an...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ge is even higher than other servings. On the other hand, breakfasts saturated ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, whereas, in addition, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1059.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01895734597 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82668745107 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568720379147 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 49.3597018355 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2727272727 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.09090909091 5.23603664747 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115113883498 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.051829145637 0.103423049105 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0344785212862 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0826013815601 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396995212169 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.