The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals, of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much
There are three charts graph describe that three different types of nutrients used in meal which is eaten by people such in usa as sodium, saturated fat and sugar. If we eat too much then it's harmful for our body.
First of Ill we focus on how many proportion of different nutrition used in breakfast. Exactly 14 percentage of sodium use in breakfast. While, the ratio of saturated fat and sugar ingredients are same in breakfast and that is 16%. But the proportion of all three previous ingredients are lower then other diets. Furthermore, the ratio of fat in lunch are three percentage less than sodium.
It is highly observe that in dinner proportion of salt and fat are used 43 and 37 percentage respectively. 80% sugar add in dinner which is less than other two ingredients. According to all three previous data we can say that dinner food is a much more harmful because the ratio all three ingredients are so high. Whereas, snacks contain highest proportion of glucose and that is 42 percentage. 35% is a total of other two ingredients.
Overall, dinner food is not too much good because it contains 43 and 37 percentage of sodium and fat respectively. Whereas, junk food contain more sugar and other diets.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-08 | nobitaa | 78 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 11 | view |
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-06 | Tosyne | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the results survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 73
- Nowadays many people choose to be self employed rather than to work for a company or organization Why might this be the case What could be the disadvantages of being self employed 61
- The charts below show what UK graduate and post graduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 67
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries to tourist information office made by telephone letter email and in person from January 2001 to June 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relev 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun proportion seems to be countable; consider using: 'many proportions'.
Suggestion: many proportions
...r body. First of Ill we focus on how many proportion of different nutrition used in breakfas...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 290, Rule ID: COMPARISONS_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'lower than'?
Suggestion: lower than
...n of all three previous ingredients are lower then other diets. Furthermore, the ratio of ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ll three previous ingredients are lower then other diets. Furthermore, the ratio of ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 14, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'observed'.
Suggestion: observed
...ntage less than sodium. It is highly observe that in dinner proportion of salt and f...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'contain the highest'.
Suggestion: contain the highest
...ngredients are so high. Whereas, snacks contain highest proportion of glucose and that is 42 pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1011.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76886792453 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70171862948 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509433962264 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.394247858 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 72.2142857143 112.824112599 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1428571429 22.9334400587 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.78571428571 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197108780345 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639115877402 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713807585051 0.0843802449381 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134503918505 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0818803803927 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.6 13.2329268293 65% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.79 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.06 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.