The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the average percentages in typical meals of three types of nutrients, all of which may be unhealthy if eaten too much.

The pie charts show the proportions in three meals and snacks of three types of ingredients which can do harm to our body if consumed too much.

Firstly, the breakfast makes up 14% of sodium and 16% of saturated fat and added sugar. The lunch takes up the percentage of 29%, 26%, 19% in sodium, saturated fat and added sugar respectively. As for dinner, 43% of sodium,37% of saturated fat and 23% of added sugar is consumed during the dinner. What’s more, snacks also play an important role in the nutrient consumption. Near a half of added sugar(42%) is from snacks. They also contain 14% of sodium and 21% of saturated fat, which is similar to the breakfast.

Through comparison, we can learn that breakfast contains least of the nutrients. dinner has the most sodium and saturated fat while snacks have the most added sugar. Therefore, in order to control the amount of nutrients taken by ourselves, the dinner and snacks should be limited first.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-01-26 yasamin27 73 view
2020-01-16 Noah1997 78 view
2020-01-15 BIBHU KALITA 11 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 67 view
2020-01-12 ppatel 56 view
Essays by user Claudia1208 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 11, column 82, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Dinner
...akfast contains least of the nutrients. dinner has the most sodium and saturated fat w...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, so, therefore, while, as for

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89696969697 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6120719956 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.0017999352 43.030603864 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 80.8 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117263393327 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455303748214 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0892345368372 0.0843802449381 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123191089461 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.130933021475 0.0819641961636 160% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 80.62 61.2550243902 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.84 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.