The line graphs show data on the ownership of household devices and the duration of housework done by families in a country between 1920 and 2019.
Overall, the possession of household machines had significantly increased since 1930, with refrigerators and vacuum cleaners being owned by every family. As a result, the amount of housework needed to be done by people declined proportionately.
Between 1920 and 2019, the line graphs show how household ownership of various electrical appliances and time spent per week doing housework in the country changed. According to the first graph, the proportion of households that own these devices has increased over time, with every family owning both refrigerators and cleaners by 2019. The most significant change – vacuum overall was observed between 1920 and 1960; whereas the proportion of households with fridges increased markedly from nearly none to 90%, the proportion of households with washers and vacuums increased more- modestly, both reaching 70%. Following that, ownership of refrigerators reached 100 percent in 1980, and ownership of 1960 washing machines followed in 2000. Following that, ownership of 1960 washing machines was acquired. Vacuum cleaner ownership fell to around 65 percent in 1980 before recovering and reaching a high of 75 percent in 2019.
- Task 1 The graph below gives information about the percentage of people living in Australia who were born in Asia the UK and other regions 67
- The graph below shows population figures for India and China since the year 2000 and predicted population growth up until 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 95
- Life cycle and anatomy of a lady bird 56
- The graph below gives information from Annual Energy Outlook 2008 about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projection until 2030.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The picture illustrates how a medical centre changed after some developments in 2010 compared to 2008 61
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 204 200
No. of Characters: 1088 1000
No. of Different Words: 109 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.779 4.0
Average Word Length: 5.333 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.859 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 88 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 50 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22.667 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.206 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.333 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.435 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.603 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.139 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 3 4