the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019. Summarise in the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant
The line graphs illustrate percentage of families which used electrical devices and how much time per week these household spent on housework such as washing clothes, preparing meals as well as cleaning in a nation over 99 years since 1920.
As can be seen on charts, the proportion of households using washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner witnessed an increase trend while amount of time which these household used for doing chores at home experienced a reverse trend between 1920 and 2019.
To begin with the first chart, the rate of families applying fridges begun at the lowest point of chart, with just around 1% in 1920 but after 40 years, this figure rose significantly to exactly 90% before increased lightly by 10% in 1980, which reached maximum percentage at 100%. In addition, this rate was stable for the last 39 years. In terms of vacuum cleaner, the ratio for these devices witnesses a dramatically rise from around 30% to 100% between 1920 and 2019 while the data on washing machine went up quickly from 40% to 70% over 40 years since 1920 before it dropped slightly by 5% after 20 years. 39 years later, it reached roughly 75%, which was lower than figure for others electronic devices.
On the one hand, the amount of hours per week which a family spent on doing housework experienced a significantly decrease of 30 hours over 40 years since 1920 before it keep going down slowly to 10 hour per week after 59 years.
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasizes that their product are new in some way Why is it Do you think it is positive or negative development 73
- The maps show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparison where relevant 67
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 67
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 406, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('rise') instead of another adjective.
..., the ratio for these devices witnesses a dramatically rise from around 30% to 100% between 1920 an...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 99, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('significantly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('decrease') instead of another adjective.
...ly spent on doing housework experienced a significantly decrease of 30 hours over 40 years since 1920 be...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 200, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'hour' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'hours'.
Suggestion: hours
... before it keep going down slowly to 10 hour per week after 59 years.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, well, while, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 251.0 196.424390244 128% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80079681275 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44923052792 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 147.0 106.607317073 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585657370518 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 341.1 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 83.3855074767 43.030603864 194% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.142857143 112.824112599 153% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.8571428571 22.9334400587 156% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8571428571 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153692342328 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067873923419 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522901744421 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105772696719 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309332246644 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.87 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 11.4329268293 157% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.