the charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework in household in one country between 1920 and 2019. Summarise in the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparation where relevant
The line graphs illustrate the percentage of household applying electrical appliances and a number of hours which household spent doing housework in a nation during a period of 99 years since 1920.
As can be seen from the first line graph, the proportion of household using washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner witnessed a rise trend while amount of time which a family doing housework per week experience a reverse trend.
To begin with, the ratio of household applying washing machine increased quickly 30% from 1920 to 1960 before it dropped slightly to about 65% after 20 year. Then, it rose slightly to 75% in 2019 which was a lowest point of the line graph compared to data of fridge and vacuum cleaner. In terms of figure for fridge, starting at the lowest point in 1920, with around 1%, it rose dramatically to 90% before reach 100% 20 years later and kept stable for the last of 39 year. Besides, the rate of families using vacuum cleaner went up significantly to 100% over 80 year since 1920 and remained unchanged for the last 19 year.
On the other hand, the number of hours which a family spent doing chores went down shapely by 30 hours from 1920 to 1960 before kept going down slowly to roughly 10% after 59 years.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparison where relevant 73
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries owing a home rather than renting one is very important for people Why might this be case Do you think this is positive or negative situation 56
- In come cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
- Some people argue that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others believe that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use 'the' with the superlative.
Suggestion: the
... rose slightly to 75% in 2019 which was a lowest point of the line graph compared...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, then, while, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38452309975 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581818181818 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.0732026676 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.714285714 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131588724748 0.215688989381 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654474346071 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586442071549 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0980592231387 0.15604864568 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.059336643554 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.76 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 17.5 11.4329268293 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.