The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 content com android chrome FileProvider images screenshot 1629221490316151501759 jpg

The first chart gives information about the proportion of families who have electrical devices such as washing machine, refrigerator and vacuum cleaner while the other chart describes how much time one household spend for houseworks in a specific country from 1920 to 2019.
Overall, usage of all appliances was the highest at the end of the period and lowest in the beginning. Despite of this, total hour of houseworks which are washing clothes, preparing meals and cleaning decreased gradually in the hundred year period.
In the first chart, people almost did not have refrigerator in 1920 but they started to use more and it was become the one of the most using tool in these all three from 1960 to 2019. Similarly, vacuum cleaner was another machine which families used most in the interval of 2000 and 2019 although they owned approximately 30% in 1920. Comprise to them, washing machine had fluctations and close to 40% in the first but it reached to just over 70% at the end.
In the second chart, houseworks were done by people almost 50 hours in a week of 1920 and it was the highest number of the chart while they did slightly over 30 hours after 20 years. Also, the amount of time that people spend declined to almost 10 hours in a week in 2019.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, similarly, so, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66367713004 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43121297239 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 125.0 106.607317073 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.560538116592 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.4803576989 43.030603864 127% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.0 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.875 22.9334400587 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.375 5.23603664747 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165848511906 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0693798174483 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564462602433 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102499855982 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584695067182 0.0819641961636 71% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.