Many people frequently try to figuring out the historical background of their houses or apartmens which they live in. I think, they have many reasons for doing this and they can learn in different ways.
The main aim of finding out the history of houses is getting an imagination for how people was living in the past. In other words, they want to know the earlier type of their homes and how much it changed. Furthermore, people own their parents or maybe grandparent’s houses sometimes and this cause to more historical questions. For instance, they could ask who built this house and how they built or when did they build. These type of topics are the reasons behind the wanting to learn since they aim to feel more confident about the place they live.
One effective research type for understand the history is asking to old people about the past years. Especially, local people who was lived in that area or neighbourhood could know the buildings and houses or even they could have some pictures of it. Additionally, if people aspire to imagine the street or gardens of their apartmens, then they should find the earlier owner of the houses. In that way, people who interested in learning about the history could listen the answers about past such as old people could tell a story or a memory about that house or some historical events could be happen when they live in there.
To conclude, in some countries people feeling curious about the history of their homes more and more every day and some reasons lag behind this. They could find the backgrounds of the building with several ways and techniques.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give y 67
- As most people spend a major part of their adult life at work job satisfaction is an important element of individual wellbeing What factors contribute to job satisfaction How realistic is the expectation of job satisfaction for all workers Give reasons f 73
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, may, so, then, for instance, i think, such as, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1342.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77580071174 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40839306143 2.80592935109 86% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508896797153 0.561755894193 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9084800845 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.230769231 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.531584007136 0.244688304435 217% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.190637899851 0.084324248473 226% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783569367311 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340545817673 0.151304729494 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611324356241 0.056905535591 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 50.2224549098 134% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.4159519038 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.