The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas.
The charts illustrate the population of some cities in different years and the world population in cities and villages from 1980 to 2010, in a duration of 30 years. Overall, as it can be seen in five cities the population growth and Tokyo has the most increase during the period. New York and Tokyo were the crowd cities in 1950 and 2010 respectively and urban increased, whereas rural leveled out in the word.
As is given in the bar chart Tokyo had the biggest population by about 15 million, while Jakarta was the minimum item in the list by almost 3 in 1970. After four decades, the population in Tokyo increased and stood on more than 25, and the Jakarta population raised approximately six times and reached roughly 18.
The table depicts the population in new york was exactly 12.5 millions people. After 60 years Tokyo added to the top of the table by 27.6 million the most crowded cities in the word.
In the line graph, it is evidence that people who lived in cities increased and achieved a little more than four billion in 2010. The rural men have a remain static about 3 billion between 1980 and 2010.
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 84
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 84
- The charts below give Information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy In 2000 and projections for 2050. 56
- Food travels thousands of miles from producers to consumers. Some people think that it would be better for the environment and economy if people only ate the local food produced by farmers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... york was exactly 12.5 millions people. After 60 years Tokyo added to the top of the ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...our billion in 2010. The rural men have a remain static about 3 billion between 1980 and...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.56218905473 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35213441864 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557213930348 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6582834907 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.888888889 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.23603664747 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260760286573 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10629494803 0.103423049105 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0810584683669 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14383209343 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10415800947 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.46 11.4140731707 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.