The charts demonstrate the rise in population number in different metropolitan cities, besides the allocation of population in cities and villages. Looking from an overall perspective, Tokyo has topped the charts through the years, whilst population growth was more rapid in Bombay and Jakarta. In addition, more people started living in cities rather than rural areas as time passed.
Looking into details of the bar graph, Tokyo came first with population number higher than 25 million in 2010. Followed by Bombay, which has witnessed a significant increase in population number having exactly 5 million citizens back in 1970 compared to 27 million in 2010. Also, Shanghai ranked third in 2010 followed by Jakarta and New York respectively.
Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that in 1950, New York had the highest population of exactly 12.5 million, followed by London, Tokyo, Paris and Moscow, subsequently. Whereas, Tokyo came first in 2010 with approximately 27.6 million citizens, hence Bombay and Lagos came second and third, as New York fell out of the top 5.
However, it can by noted that more people started to favour living in urban areas rather than rural ones. 3 million lived in villages in 1980 and below 2 million lived in cities. While in 2010, slightly above 4 million lived in suburbs compared to nearly 3 million who preferred living in the countryside.
- The charts below show the growth in the population in some of the world’s largest cities as well as the population distribution in urban and rural areas. 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of households in owned and rented accommodation in England and Wales between 1918 and 2011.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem? 50
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... by Jakarta and New York respectively. Furthermore, it is worth mentioning that...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, second, so, third, whereas, while, as to, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1164.0 965.302439024 121% => OK
No of words: 225.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17333333333 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67683247492 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 106.607317073 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586666666667 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 342.9 283.868780488 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.6969556548 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.818181818 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4545454545 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3636363636 5.23603664747 198% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150338628075 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648985959213 0.103423049105 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0629440014869 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0968449252701 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0832830722954 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.