The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show local government expenditure in 2010 and 2015.

Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate about the data of expenditures of the local government in the time of 2010 and 2015.
Overall, the graphs provide the proportion of spending money on the nine sectors by local authority, where, the percentage of interest on borrowing had become double in 2015. However, the amount of expenditure on all sectors had decreased in 2015 except transportation and interest on borrowing.
Turning to the pie chart of 2010, where, its indicated that education was the highest money consumption field at 24%. Followed by, health care and pension were also the more costly field than others which stood at 20% and 19% respectively. In contrast, transport (3%), culture and leisure (2%) and other (1%) sectors were being less expense by the local authority among the other fields. Moreover, the spending on welfare and interest on borrow were 8% and 5% respectively.
In 2015, we can see that, the government expenditure had been increasing in welfare and interest on borrowing at 13% and 10% respectively. Though, again education (21%) was the highest money spended sector by local authority and health care (20%) was in second position. On the other hand, expenditure of transportation, cultural and leisure and others were reduced in 2015, where, only 1% money were spending on these categories. While, cost for pension was reaming same in both years.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-07-15 Zahid6400 73 view
2024-07-15 Zahid6400 67 view
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-07-15 dorae 67 view
2024-07-14 Zahid6400 61 view
Essays by user ismatjahan :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, moreover, second, so, while, in contrast, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1140.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08928571429 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81666358481 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540178571429 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.2536939965 43.030603864 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.636363636 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3636363636 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.72727272727 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161874384658 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710158161606 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756445221384 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137362831633 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0824327067804 0.0819641961636 101% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.87 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.