The provided bar chart illustrate the data regarding how many girls are there per 100 boys in 3 different education systems: primary, secondary and tertiary.
Generally, fewer girls than boys were studying at schools both in 1990 and in 2000 in all countries, except for pupils at tertiary schools in developed countries, in which boys were outnumbered by girls.
In details, there was a noticeably big discrepancy in the numbers of male and female students in developing countries with the number of girls per 100 boys at 66 in 1990 and 75 in 2000 in tertiary education. The highest ratio of female students in developing countries was 83 in 1990 and 87 in 2000 per 100 boys prior to primary education's students' statistic. As for secondary education students, girls' number of 72 in 1990 and 82 in 2000 were considerably few than males'.
As for statistics in developed countries, the ratio of girls per 100 boys was almost same in secondary education being 98 and 99 in both years. At tertiary schools 105 girls in 1990 and 112 females in 2000 exceeded the number of boys studying at the same institution. Primary education's studying girls' number followed general trend at 83 in 1990 and 87 in 2000 that were less than boys'.
Overall, the information shows more studying girls in developed countries in comparison to developing ones' data.
- The graph below shows four countries of residence of overseas students in Australia.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work https ielts simon com a 6a0120a5bb05d8970c01b8d0f4cae8970c 500wi 72
- Directors of large companies often receive much bigger salary increases than ordinary workers. Employers' organisations say that in a global market this is necessary to attract the best management talent.What are your views? 84
- In many countries children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility.What are your opinions on this? 73
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 44
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 103, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...d countries in comparison to developing ones data.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, second, so, as for, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1123.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92543859649 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76270881898 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.456140350877 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 318.6 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.5350063945 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.777777778 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20337015391 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103698489814 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402723974566 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128525088416 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0266923942314 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.99 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.