The charts below show the number of Japanese tourists travelling abroad between 1985 and 1995 and Australia’s share of the Japanese tourist market. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The change in the millions of Japanese visitors going overseas and the rate of Australia’s market income of Japanese tourists is displayed in the bar chart and line graph.
Overall, travelling abroad for Japanese were popular year-to-year. Furthermore, Australia was more and more well-known among Japanese, although the number of them showed some changes.
Initially, Japanese was less likely to visit other countries, showing about only 5 million people, being the lowest number. Turning to the tourist market of Australia, this nation earned share from 2% of Japanese travel, being the minumum data recorded.
Eventually, the popularity of Japanese visiting increased dramatically to more than threefold, being the highest number. When it comes to Australia, even though the figure for Japanese travelling in this nation experienced a downward trend in 1889, it had recovered to be three times of the figure in the initial year by 1994, indicating to gain the most amount of income.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-19 | Guiseppe59192 | view | |
| 2022-02-07 | luckydough55 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-07 | luckydough55 | 73 | view |
| 2021-12-16 | mnaufaln | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | Audric | view |
- The graph below shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country on different days 78
- Some people think that government is responsible for the rise in obesity in children Do you agree or disagree 78
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
- Today more people are travelling than ever before Why is this the case What are the benefits of travelling for the traveller Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 89
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by three companies over a period of 15 years 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4064516129 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80032702119 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664516129032 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.8137377195 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.714285714 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 22.9334400587 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.29811259222 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.138920782079 0.103423049105 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0648430334681 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18467604067 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0476117386558 0.0819641961636 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 61.2550243902 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.3012195122 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.