The charts below show the percentage of electricity consumed by different sectors in Eastern Australia in 2007 and 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie charts illustrate electricity use in various fields in Eastern Australia between 2007 and 2010.
Overall, the use of all sectors, excluding Aluminium, Manufacturing and Other Metal fields remained stable over the course of 4 years. It is also transparent that electricity consumption from Residential and Commercial sectors was by far the most significant.
In the year 2007, Residential sector consumed over a quarter of the total electricity, while Commercial area was slightly behind. Manufacturing and Aluminium industries both used 13% of the total electricity, while Other Metals and Mining consumed somewhat less, at 12% and 9% respectively. Transport and Agriculture, on the other hand, occupied only a small percentage of the total electricity use.
In the next 3 years, while the quantity of power from Other Metals area increased by 6%, there was a slight decrease in the areas of Aluminium and Industrial to approximately a tenth of the total. The proportions of electricity consumption in other fields matched the initial figures.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2021-11-04 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
2021-11-04 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
2021-06-22 | singh798 | 78 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of time working adults spent on different activities in a particular country in 1958 and 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 90
- The table below shows the questionnaire about the opinions of club members and the general public for the new theater in one town in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- Topic some people think that it is more effective for students to study in groups while others believe that it is better for them to study alone Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- More people put their personal information online addresses telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 898.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44242424242 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.16935510063 2.65546596893 119% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.7743508982 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.25 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.625 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124264189907 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0641523274686 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0663744382201 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936519088608 0.15604864568 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772879733899 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.4329268293 109% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.