The charts below show the percentage of spending on different areas in the average household in one country in 1910 and 1960 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of spending on different areas in the average household in one country in 1910 and 1960. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The pie charts illustrate the expenditure of an average household distributed to the different needs in their life in 1990 and 2010.

It is clear that amount of money spending on food and clothing had witnessed a significant decrease, whereas an opposite trend was true for the aspects of entertainment, healthcare, housing and others.

In 1990, the expenditure on food was standing at exactly 43%. After a period of one century, this figure had plummeted of 10%, at 33% in 2010. Meanwhile, the budget spending on clothing shown the similar trend and this also decreased with a same amount, went down to 14% at the same time.

On the other hand, there were a dramatically increase in the term of residential demanding over the period of one century, starting from 1910, which reached up to the percentage of 33% among the total of budget paying for a variety of purposes in their life. This similar trend was also regarded when considering about the spending on entertainment or miscellaneous; while the amount of money putting into medical caring had nearly remained unchanged at this period.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-05-01 hardyboywwe 84 view
Essays by user hardyboywwe :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 31, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... time. On the other hand, there were a dramatically increase in the term of residential demanding ov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, whereas, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00543478261 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83042622553 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603260869565 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.0290597744 43.030603864 153% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.571428571 112.824112599 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2857142857 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 5.23603664747 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0870907225543 0.215688989381 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411635215892 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0391723513366 0.0843802449381 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599974130757 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0410476560234 0.0819641961636 50% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.