the charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014
The charts illustrate the proportion of volunteers in 6 different subjects in one organization in 2008 and 2014The charts illustrate the proportion of volunteers in 6 different subjects in one organization in 2008 and 2014
Overall, in 2014, the percent of volunteers in environment, art and the other aspects decreased compared to this percentage in 2008. However, the proportion of sport, health care and education volunteer rised in 2014
In 2008, the rate of educational volunteers was the highest in all other categories with 24% of all volunteer members.Besides, environmental volunteers took the second spot in all subjects in this following year.The proportion of sport and other subjects volunteer member was the similar with 15% of all volunteer in this organization. 6% of volunteers acted in the aspect of healthcare, so this was the lowest percent of all categories.
In constrast, there was some changes in the next 8 years. The percent of environmental volunteers increased dramatically to 29% of all aspects of volunteer, so it became the highest proportion. The measures of sport volunteers also rose by approximately 10% compared to their figure in 2008. Volunteers in health care grew slightly from 7% in 2008 to 8% in 2014. In contrast, the rates of educational, art and the other sections volunteering member had the downward in 2014.The figure for art and other volunteers both fell 6 % and decreased 7% for education in 6 years later
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-18 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-22 | Mei1312 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-10 | bobsubnot | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-11 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-05-18 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to get news However others believe that they can get news better through other media platforms Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people believe that bicycles are the best mode of transport in the cities while others disagree Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of both views and give your opinion 67
- the charts below show the percentage of volunteers by organizations in 2008 and 2014 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Overall, in 2014, the percent of volunte...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and education volunteer rised in 2014 In 2008, the rate of educational volunte...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Besides
...ories with 24% of all volunteer members.Besides, environmental volunteers took the seco...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 219, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... in all subjects in this following year.The proportion of sport and other subjects ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the lowest percent of all categories. In 2014, there was some changes in 8 yea...
^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[3]
Message: You should probably use 'volunteer'.
Suggestion: volunteer
...ghest proportion. The measures of sport volunteers also rose by approximately 10% compared...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15306122449 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19002832532 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489795918367 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 296.1 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 112.245754374 43.030603864 261% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 126.25 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25095647663 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116811930622 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697478666738 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19859069126 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0247873348191 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.4329268293 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.