The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The pie graphs illustrate the proportion of total water usage by five sectors in Sydney, from 1997 to 2007.
Overall, the percentages of water used by the food industry were the largest in both years. Besides, the rates of total water usage by the service industry nearly doubled between 1997 and 2007.
Although the number of water usage by the food industry decreased by 7% from 48% (1997), this sector always accounted for the highest rates over 10 years. Besides, the percentages of the total water used by the manufacturing and building industry also slightly fell from 15% and 5% (1997) to 11% and 2% 2007 (2007), respectively.
By contrast, the figure for total water usage by the service industry increased dramatically from 13% (1997) to 25% (2007). Because of the jump almost double in 10 years, this sector acquired the second most popular water used in 2007. Besides that, the rate of water usage by household use also grew slightly from 19% (1997) to the figure which was less than two times the number of the food industry.
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films. Whycould this be?Should governments give more financial support to local film industries? 67
- The media should include more stories which report good news. To whatextent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year. 84
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the oldhouses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom tobuild houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 73
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the oldhouses in the local areas, while others think that people should have freedom tobuild houses of their own styles. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 2007
...fell from 15% and 5% 1997 to 11% and 2% 2007 2007, respectively. By contrast, the figur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 398, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... times the number of the food industry.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74860335196 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37123035002 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497206703911 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 28.5807518271 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.25 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212909038363 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119651032862 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0380585581757 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162870405849 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0127561418303 0.0819641961636 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.46 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.