The charts below show percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, in 1997 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and making comparisons where relevant.
The pie graphs illustrate the proportion of total water usage by five sectors in Sydney, from 1997 to 2007.
Overall, the percentages of water used by the food industry were the largest in both years. Besides, the rates of total water usage by the service industry nearly doubled between 1997 and 2007.
Although the number of water usage by the food industry decreased by 7% from 48% (1997), this sector always accounted for the highest rates over 10 years. Besides, the percentages of the total water used by the manufacturing and building industry also slightly fell from 15% and 5% (1997) to 11% and 2% 2007 (2007), respectively.
By contrast, the figure for total water usage by the service industry increased dramatically from 13% (1997) to 25% (2007). Because of the jump almost double in 10 years, this sector acquired the second most popular water used in 2007. The rate of water usage by household use also grew slightly from 19% (1997) to the figure which was less than two times the number of the food industry.
- The tables compare the amount of money of selling coffee and bananas, in two separate years, in five difference EU nations. 67
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age 67
- The pie charts below show the proportions of the total school expenditure in five different sources between 1981 and 2001. 61
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because oftechnology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships that peoplemake? Has this been a positive or negative development? 78
- The table below shows the amount of waste production (in millions of tonnes) in six different countries over a twenty-year period. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: 2007
...fell from 15% and 5% 1997 to 11% and 2% 2007 2007, respectively. By contrast, the figur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 384, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... times the number of the food industry.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, second, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 838.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73446327684 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37825595253 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.491525423729 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.6150216043 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.75 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.125 5.23603664747 60% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21364693349 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120114037128 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375203726287 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163517001103 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0122253930448 0.0819641961636 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.4 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.