The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

Both pie charts report the average of water using by numerous factors in Sydney in the year of 1997 and 2007.

It is noticeable that between 2 charts, food industry was still took the first place in using water, Beside that, building industry reduced their already lowest average of water consumption down to 3%.

their was a change in ranking the proportion of water each industry consumed. Although the amount of water for taking care of family and manufacturing slightly adjusted their numbers, serving industry took a surprising jump by increased their percentage up 12%. And last but not least, the highest consumption had decreased its proportion down 8%.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-11-25 Drragkloha 84 view
2019-10-15 khoavodoj 73 view
2019-09-03 Lucy_067 56 view
2019-04-30 tuanly 73 view
2019-01-15 huathibichngoc.c3.ltt@gmail.com 73 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both pie charts report the average of wa...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ney in the year of 1997 and 2007. It is noticeable that between 2 charts, ...
^^^
Line 5, column 68, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...tween 2 charts, food industry was still took the first place in using water, Beside ...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...age of water consumption down to 3%. their was a change in ranking the pro...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 4, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Their
...ter consumption down to 3%. their was a change in ranking the proportion ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, still

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 563.0 965.302439024 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 109.0 196.424390244 55% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16513761468 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.231146315 3.73543355544 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59086207319 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.697247706422 0.547539520022 127% => OK
syllable_count: 161.1 283.868780488 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2249938995 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.4 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14277190726 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083084502125 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0940886247589 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126342075192 0.15604864568 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.099308939089 0.0819641961636 121% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.