The charts above compare the percentage of water usage of various sectors in Sydney, Australia between 1997 and 2007.
While the figures for all sectors changed between the two surveyed years, it is clear that the food industry consumed the highest amount of water overall. Building industry, on the other hand, had the lowest percentage of water usage out of all sectors.
There are three sectors experienced the decline of the total water use percentage in 2007, compared with 1997. The food industry accounted for 48% in 1997, but only 41% for 2007. Manufacturing and building industry 's water used also fell 3-4% each. While building industry still maintained the lowest position, manufacturing sector from third place with 15% percent in 1997 is down to fourth place in 2007 with only 11%.
Noticeably, there was a major increase in the proportion of water used by the service sector, from 13% to 25%. Also, household use of water slightly rose 2% to reach 21% in 2007.
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why students chose to study at a particular UK university in 1987 and in 2007. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparison where relevant 78
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The graph shows the proportion of energy that was produced from coal in four European countries from 1995 to 2010 84
- The diagram shows the life cycle of the honey bee. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, still, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 819.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96363636364 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46433513516 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606060606061 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.1946965702 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257001918479 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.123394055039 0.103423049105 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0854582737214 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179945418593 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859872599835 0.0819641961636 105% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.