The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The charts below show the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant

The six pie charts illustrate the utilization of water in six different areas of the world. It is interesting to notice that North America and Europe have the similar trend of using water while Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia are likely using the same pattern for water usages. South America has the unique proportion of utilizing water.

The first water-use group includes North America and Europe, which the majority of water used for the industrial sector which accounts for approximately 50%. The second large proportion of water usage goes for agriculture which consumes about 32% water. Domestic use is the least percentage which accounts for about 15%.

Africa, Central Asia, and South East Asia are listed in the second group which tends to consume much water (more than 80%) for Agricultural field. The little amount of water is using for Industrial need and Domestic demand, which are less than 10% for each sector in both Africa and Central Asia. South East Asia uses 12% water for Industry and 7% water for domestic use.
South America does tend to use water as much as the second group for Agriculture which used 71% of total water consumption. The area alone is the highest water consumer in Domestic use, which is 19% and the industrial sector uses the modest amount of water which is 10%.

Overall, there were the differences between the water usages among various parts of the world. North America and Europe use much water for industrial sector while Africa, Central Asia, South East Asia, and South America consume a vast of water for agriculture.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-12-31 ismlaydmr 61 view
2019-07-31 fereshtehlot 84 view
2019-03-09 Minh Minh Noo 84 view
2018-09-16 suykaaa 73 view
2017-12-18 Feb 67 view
Essays by user theresa_trangnguyen :

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1321.0 965.302439024 137% => OK
No of words: 266.0 196.424390244 135% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96616541353 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.29796442772 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451127819549 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 419.4 283.868780488 148% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1523364209 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.615384615 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4615384615 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.15384615385 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227530019512 0.215688989381 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126247483121 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610398813998 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167066032611 0.15604864568 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282976750819 0.0819641961636 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.