The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney, Australia, in 1997 and 2007. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts compare the number of water usage for various areas in Sydney, an Australian city, in the year 1997 and 2007.
Overall, it can be seen that the food industry was a sector that used water with the highest proportion in both 1997 and 2007, while the building industry made up the lowest rate. Besides, the percentage of total water usage nearly doubled for the service industry.
In 1997, the proportion of water use in the food industry accounted for 48%. This figure was witnessed a slight decrease in 2007, at 41%. Similarly, the rates for the building industry and the manufacturing were 5% and 15% respectively. The numbers were straitened in 2007, with 2% for the building industry and 11% for the manufacturing.
By contrast, a downtrend was noted in the percentage of water used in the other sectors. The figure for household use was 19% in 1997 before rising slightly to 21% in 2007. The water used by the service industry increased significantly to 25% in 2007, compared to 13% in 1997.
- The graph below shows different sources of air pollutants in the UK from 1990 to 2005 Summarise information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 76
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- The charts below show the percentage of water used by different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, similarly, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78409090909 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66005591464 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522727272727 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.087135603 43.030603864 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.2 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.9 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196048270609 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0916792246756 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0507907759831 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141304794686 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431451818726 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.9 13.2329268293 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.