The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates how cutting instruments have evolved during the Stone Age between 1.4 million and 0.0 million years ago.
Overall, it can be seen that tool B was sharper and also was more regularly sharped than the earlier tool A. At the same time, there was an upgrade in the size of the tool, which contributed to helping the tool become more efficient.
In 1.4 million years ago, these instruments still were relatively primitive in both appearance and effectiveness. From the front and side view, while tool A was quite rough and did not have many differences compared to normal tones with blunt edges, the smooth edges of tool B showed a clear improvement to use more effectively.
Over 0.6 million years, the tip and edges of tools became much sharper. For bank view, although both tool A and B had the same length being 10 centimeters long, the surface of tool B was crafted to be smoother, which made the overall width seem to be larger.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-18 | reverjae | 56 | view |
| 2024-01-18 | reverjae | 67 | view |
| 2024-01-18 | reverjae | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | cupinsiuway | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-17 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 67 | view |
- Some people believe that visitors to other countries should follow local customs and behaviour Others disagree and think that the host country should welcome cultural differences Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 75
- Small businesses are disappearing and being replaced by large multinational companies Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 92
- Some people think that newly built houses should follow the style of the old houses in the local areas while others think that people should have freedom to build houses of their own styles Discuss both views and give your own opinion 67
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.70238095238 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52705737785 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654761904762 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.3390852693 43.030603864 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.857142857 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11257935465 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0529077608423 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0272922766566 0.0843802449381 32% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0709129796653 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015592467198 0.0819641961636 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.28 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.