The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given picture illustrates the evolution over 600,00 years of devices which were used for cutting in the Stone Age.
Overall, after 0.6 million years, it has witnessed a significant improvement of cutting tools with the robustion. Another noticeable point is that the item which was found nearby is more functional than the other one.
Regarding the tool A in the diagram, the tool which was found around 1.4 million years ago is small, and the statistics show that the length of this tool is around 8 centimeters. It is true to say that this item is rudimentary because of the uneven surface combined with the dull edge that it has.
Turning into the tool B which was found 0.8 years ago is bigger than the other one with the length of around 10 centimeters, the shape of this tool is more apparent than that one mentioned in the diagram. Initially, it is witnessed a change from an undefinable shape into a teardrop-shape tool, which is rounded base and a pointy tip in the end. It is also considered a highly symmetrical tool than that one in the past, with the edge more sharpened. Moreover, the way that people refined this tool also allowed it to become more smooth than the other one.
- The chart below shows the number of people in Europe who were affected by four types of noise by day and by night in cities and rural areas in 2007 67
- The chart shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops opening in a country from 2011 to 2018 67
- Some experts suggest that when a country is already rich any additional increase in economic wealth does not make its citizens happier To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries China and India Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram illustrates the process of making olive oil along a production line 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'An' instead of 'A' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: An
...n the other one. Regarding the tool A in the diagram, the tool which was foun...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, moreover, regarding, so, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 7.0 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 3.15609756098 380% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 213.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66197183099 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82027741392 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54285060116 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507042253521 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.1047768277 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.333333333 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6666666667 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11648011311 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.052691246435 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0426478375861 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0795791999525 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0216726580001 0.0819641961636 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.