The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given picture demonstrates the enhancement of primitive cutting tools. Overall, in over 0.6 million years, the tools witnessed a significant change in both size and shape. Additionally, this enhancement of cutting tools also contributes to the increase of effectiveness while utilizing.
Regarding tool A which dates back to 1.4 million years ago, its size was measured and recorded at approximately 8 cm in length and 4 cm in width. Looking from the front view, its shape resembles natural rock and has a rough surface. Turning to the side view, the estimation of its thickness was about 2.5 cm. In the back, the large bottom part was perhaps the handle, while the pointy tip served the cutting purpose.
In terms of tool B, after a period of 0.6 million years the cutting tool observed a significant modification with the increase in size ( about 11 cm in length and 6 in width). From the front view, the shape of tool B was altered which was identical to the shape of teardrop with a pointy tip and a round bottom and it had a flatter surface. In the side view, the cutting tool was shrunk to advance the sharpness. The back view clearly displays the bigger size of tool B compared to tool A.
- Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows the percentages of Australian export with four countries The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 You should write at least 150 words 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The table below shows the number of temporary migrant worker in four countries in 2003 and 2006 and the number of these workers per 1 000 people in these countries in 2006 Summarise the information by selecti 73
- The bar chart below shows the popularity of well known Instagram accounts in 2011 and 2021 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 135, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t modification with the increase in size about 11 cm in length and 6 in width. Fr...
^^
Line 3, column 487, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...igger size of tool B compared to tool A.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, regarding, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 989.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66509433962 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6855948876 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.614325282 43.030603864 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.9090909091 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2727272727 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72727272727 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0968683562967 0.215688989381 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0460921144844 0.103423049105 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319051394128 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741871306628 0.15604864568 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0329395177702 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.