The charts below show the percentages of male and female students getting top grades (A and B) in school examinations in 1960 and 2000.
The column charts illustrate the differences and changes in the proportions of students of both genders getting top grades in examinations provided by five different subjects in 1960 and 2000. Overall, what stands out from the graph is that there were upward trends in most categories; while the performances of men in Arts, Languages and the percentage of women in Maths, Languages that bucked the trend.
In particular, when it comes to Sciences, the graph witnessed a sharp increase from 30%-40% for male students and from 20%-25% for female counterparts in the percentages of students. Similarly, concerning Humanities, the number of students stood at 15% for boys and 22% for girls, then rose by 10% and 13% respectively.
Meanwhile, in terms of Languages, the proportion of male students remained stable at about 37% over the period. However, there was a downward trend from 45% to 40% in the figure. Concerning Maths, the period experienced a considerable growth of 10% from 25% to 35% in the proportion of boys. Otherwise, a decrease from 15% to 10% was underwent in the percentages of girls, which constantly accounted for the lowest numbers. Regarding Arts, the numbers of students started at 30%, 25% for male students and finished at 20%, 27% for female counterparts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-23 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-23 | maiphuong0610 | 84 | view |
- The world should have only one government rather than a national government for each country Do the advantages outweigh this advantage 84
- People think that in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people Why Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- The charts below show the percentages of the water used in different sectors in Sydney Australia in 1997 and 2007 89
- The maps show the change of Happy Valley Shopping Center from 1982 to 2012 87
- Many people believe that zoos have no purpose in today s world and should be closed What problems do zoos bring What are the alternatives to zoos if they are closed 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 334, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'undergone'.
Suggestion: undergone
...herwise, a decrease from 15% to 10% was underwent in the percentages of girls, which cons...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, similarly, then, while, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1074.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11428571429 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96363446661 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57619047619 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4741302386 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.333333333 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.3333333333 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211485405902 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0809912242339 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0919132954917 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14390111771 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0580323075939 0.0819641961636 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.2329268293 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.