The charts below show proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts above provide information regarding British students' language skills at one university in England from 2000 to 2010.
It is clear that British students' language competence improved. The obvious evidence is that the proportion o people who did not know other languages had a fall. In addition, Spanish was the common language, except for English.
To be specific, over a period of ten years, the number of students did not have other languages fell down from 20% to 10%. Besides, the percentage of students knew two other languages increased by 5% (went up from 10% to 15%), an impressive number for a university. Moreover, it looks like British students were interested more in Spanish and another language so the figure for these slightly risen, which were 35% and 20% in 2010 respectively. Specialty, the number of people who can speak Spanish were always highest in comparison with it of different languages.
In contrast, there was a fall in the number of students talked French, which went down from 15% to 10%. Eventually, the percentage of people were able to speak German remained with 10%.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-09 | ppatel | 73 | view |
2020-01-07 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
2019-12-24 | nguyentuananh76 | 67 | view |
2019-12-17 | Jesslynindah | 84 | view |
2019-12-01 | Gre user | 78 | view |
- Many people work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only workers benefit from this, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Putting criminals into prisons is not an effective way to deal with them. Instead, education and job training should be offered. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 61
- The charts below show proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons 78
- The energy use in six fields of Australian household as well as fumes which result from this process. 78
- The table below shows the numbers of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after it was refurbished. The charts show the result of surveys asking visitor how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods.Summar 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e provide information regarding British students language skills at one university in En...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 26, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...00 to 2010. It is clear that British students language competence improved. The obvio...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 225, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...increased by 5% went up from 10% to 15%, an impressive number for a university. M...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, look, moreover, regarding, so, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 932.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.03783783784 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68817718293 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 106.607317073 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594594594595 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.749666665 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.2 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 5.23603664747 153% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297655325339 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118792904607 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0888460166937 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198257710935 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100981241346 0.0819641961636 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.