Total time of phone calls
The chart provides information regarding the time usage of telephone calls in the UK with three groups: Local - fixed line, National and international - fixed line and mobiles (all calls) between 1995 and 2002.
It is obvious that the number of local - fixed line was always the highest despite of a fall in 2000. In addition, the figure for national and international - fixed line and mobiles experienced a constant rise by the period of eight years.
To be specific, in 1995, the total number of minutes in using local phones took the first place with over 71% while those in national and international phones and Mobiles was modest, at 38% and 3% respectively. In next years, local phones still increased constantly and peaked at 90% in 1999 before came down and reached about 60% in 2002.
In the same period, the figure for other groups grew up gradually. For example, the number of national and international calls increased by 23% and reached 61% in 2002. Especially, the number of mobiles calls went up rapidly and jumped to about 55% in 2003.
- Some people believe that unpaid community services should be a compulsory part of high school programs. What extent do you agree? 56
- Putting criminals into prisons is not an effective way to deal with them. Instead, education and job training should be offered. To what extent do you agree with this opinion? 61
- Do the government should focus only on the economy or not? 56
- The pie charts below show the membership by percentage of a fitness center in Oslo Norway in 2010 and 2015 67
- Total time of phone calls 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, still, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82777777778 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61199406512 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0984967339 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202633148994 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710532369147 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656945477102 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104811100284 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680714013797 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.