Total time of phone calls
The chart provides information regarding the time usage of telephone calls in the UK with three groups: Local - fixed line, National and international - fixed line and mobiles (all calls) between 1995 and 2002.
It is obvious that the number of local - fixed line was always the highest despite of a fall in 2000. In addition, the figure for national and international - fixed line and mobiles experienced a constant rise by the period of eight years.
To be specific, in 1995, the total number of minutes in using local phones took the first place with over 71% while those in national and international phones and Mobiles was modest, at 38% and 3% respectively. In next years, local phones still increased constantly and peaked at 90% in 1999 before came down and reached about 60% in 2002.
In the same period, the figure for other groups grew up gradually. For example, the number of national and international calls increased by 23% and reached 61% in 2002. Especially, the number of mobiles calls went up rapidly and jumped to about 55% in 2003.
- Many people work at home using modern technology today. Some people think only workers benefit from this, not the employers. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- Imprionment 11
- The maps show the centre of a small town called Islip and the plan for its development.Summarise the information about the main features. 73
- Total time of phone calls 73
- The charts show women's highest education in 1945 and 1995. Summarise the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, still, while, for example, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 869.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82777777778 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61199406512 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.555555555556 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0984967339 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 5.23603664747 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202633148994 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0710532369147 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0656945477102 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104811100284 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0680714013797 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.