The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The charts indicate information relating to the percentage of British students who could speak foreign languages in a local university, between 2000 and 2010.
Overall, after a decade, Spanish speakers still dominated the majority of that college. However, no changes were seen in the figure of German users.
In 2000, nearly one-third of the chart was made up by the students who were fluent in Spanish. Ranked second on the list was 20% of learners preferring their mother-tongue only. Besides, the number of students speaking French and another language both reached 15%, equally. Nevertheless, the least favouritism was experienced by two other languages users, proven by a mere 10% in total.
Surprisingly, there was a notable increase to 35% in the percentage of Spanish learners, in 2010. The same trend also occurred in the datum of students choosing another language and two other languages which climbed up to 20% and 15%, respectively. Meanwhile, the proportion of German speakers remained unchanged throughout the years, at 10%.
- The graph shows the percentage of visiting the cinema once a month or more between 1984 to 2000 4 age groups Summarise the information and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The map below is the town of Garlsdon A new supermarket S is planned for the town The map shows two possible sites for the supermarkets Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, nevertheless, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 887.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 165.0 196.424390244 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.37575757576 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87943214481 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636363636364 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.5334890961 43.030603864 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.9 5.23603664747 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239248151991 0.215688989381 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0836810493965 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0804930834333 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142616133353 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0864953485477 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.