The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions per person in the United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy, and Portugal between 1967 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The illustration depicts the average amount of carbon dioxide one individual could release in four distinct nations in the course of 14 years, starting from 1967.
Overall, the mass amount of emissions are still dominated by the United Kingdom (UK) regardless of its plunge throughout the years. Whereas, the opposite trend occurred significantly in Portugal.
Starting with approximately 11 metric tonnes of CO2, this feature in the UK then experienced a downward trend to roughly 8 metric tonnes in 2007. Similarly, before a plummet to below 6 metric tonnes of CO2 in 2007, the number of emissions released by Swedish showed a notable growth to above 10 metric tonnes in the 1977s.
In contrast, despite 4 metric tonnes of CO2 which is half of that in Sweden in the beginning, this data in Italia climbed quickly to around 8 metric tonnes at the end of the period. Likewise, an upward trend also took place in Portugal which increased its CO2 emissions to a tripled amount compared to a 2-metric-tonnes of CO2 in 1967.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-18 | Ahmad_off | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-15 | nguyenanh9182 | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-19 | yousefikia | 89 | view |
| 2023-04-03 | Trunggg | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- More companies have open working areas without walls and barriers in their desks Do the disadvantages of open plan offices outweigh the advantages 55
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ess of its plunge throughout the years. Whereas, the opposite trend occurred significan...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, likewise, similarly, so, still, then, whereas, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 0.0 6.8 0% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 857.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 173.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95375722543 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80503501893 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595375722543 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.0035850442 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.428571429 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7142857143 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159462979544 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726361626302 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0379659526233 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0912428279149 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0135553502257 0.0819641961636 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.