The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to in 2000 and 2010.
The pie charts depict the fraction of multilinguist pupils at one university in England in 2000 and 2010. The spectacular feature of the chart is a paramount number Britishers who are Spanish speakers.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly seen that one-fifth students were mono-linguistics in 2000 while this number collapsed by 5% after ten years. However, only 10% learners were multi-linguistics in 2000 which further burgeoned by 5% in the next decade. Also, there was an elevation in the count of french speakers by 5% in the given time.
Moving further, German linguists maintained a consistency, as in the particular time the number of speakers was static. In addition, it is interesting to note that Spanish was extensively used by novices in 2000 precisely 30% which, later, rocketed by 5%. Moreover, usage of another language plunged by 5% in the provided time interval.
Overall, languages like french and Spanish soared their speakers whereas german exhibited steady trend. Also, a step was taken towards multilingualism.
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours. 61
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 11
- The graph and pie chart below give information on in-house training courses in a large financial company. 84
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 877.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28313253012 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10811266671 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.656626506024 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 259.2 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.662520511 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6 22.9334400587 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215862334803 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770037333919 0.103423049105 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0921614556836 0.0843802449381 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130715808291 0.15604864568 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117608278773 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.