The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010.
The two pie charts provide information about the distributions of one university British in England capable to speak other languages than English in the years 2000 and 2010.
Overall, it is clear that the vast majority of students was able to speak more than one language and the most widely spoken language was Spanish.
<p class="MsoNormal"><span lang="EN-GB">It can be seen from the charts that the proportion of students spoken only Spanish as
well as English was the highest in 2010 and 2010 (30% and 35% respectively). In
contrast, the number of British students talking by the German language in 2010
stood at the same percentage as in 2010. However, the percentage of students
spoken French decreased negligibly by 5% in the 2010 year compared to 2000
years. In addition, the proportion of students speaking by another language or two
other languages increased marginally by 5 percentages during the ten years
period. Also, British students able to speak only English decreased by twice as
many in 2010 as in 2000.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-12 | Tejas Dalwadi | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | BlackDelta | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-07 | Adithya999 | 67 | view |
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 61
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 73
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both th 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...eak only English decreased by twice as many in 2010 as in 2000.
...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, well, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 920.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44378698225 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.1065174019 2.65546596893 155% => OK
Unique words: 90.0 106.607317073 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532544378698 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.2708301026 43.030603864 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.428571429 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 3.83414634146 287% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.435720629496 0.215688989381 202% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.209946362701 0.103423049105 203% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0889312198887 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161910920295 0.15604864568 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0838714895606 0.0819641961636 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.2329268293 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.