The charts below show the proportions of british students at one one university in england who were able to speak other languages in addition to english, in 2000 and 2010. summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie charts reveal the information about the percentage of one university students in england that could be able to speak the other languages in addition to english in year 2000 and 2010.
As we seen from the pie charts, they were 20% students who were speak no other languages in addition to english in year 2000. however, it was decreased in year 2010, it was only 10%. Futhermore, in year 2000 and 2010, they were 15% and 10% students who were speak french only. Afterthat, the percentum of pupils who were speak german only was common. it was only 10% in year 2000 and 2010.
Apart from this, the 30% percent students who were speak spanish in year 2000 and, it was increased in year 2010 it was 35%. Moreover, in the year 2000 and 2010 they were number of pupils who speak another languages. it was 20% and 15% respectively. Moving ahead, they were 10% students who speak two other languages in year 2000. on the other side , it was increased in year 2010, it was 15%.
In conclusion, we seen from the pie charts they were lots of students who were speak spanish language more as compared to all other languages in the year 2000 and 2010.
- Some people think cars are better way of transportation around the city. While, other prefer cycling. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 67
- The sports played in Australia 2003. All figures in percentage. 61
- Some people think cars are better way of transportation around the city. While, other prefer cycling. Discuss both views and give your opinion? 67
- The charts below show degrees granted in different fields at the national university in the years 1990,2000,and 2010. 56
- The following graph and pie chart shows the sales of a company in the first and the second quarter of the year.( in percentayge) 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 7, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
...english in year 2000 and 2010. As we seen from the pie charts, they were 20% stu...
^^^^
Line 3, column 32, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...2010. As we seen from the pie charts, they were 20% students who were speak no...
^^
Line 3, column 66, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
...harts, they were 20% students who were speak no other languages in addition to engli...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 128, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...es in addition to english in year 2000. however, it was decreased in year 2010, it was ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
...they were 15% and 10% students who were speak french only. Afterthat, the percentum o...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
...rthat, the percentum of pupils who were speak german only was common. it was only 10%...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 353, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... who were speak german only was common. it was only 10% in year 2000 and 2010. ...
^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
...this, the 30% percent students who were speak spanish in year 2000 and, it was increa...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... of pupils who speak another languages. it was 20% and 15% respectively. Moving ah...
^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: On
...speak two other languages in year 2000. on the other side , it was increased in ye...
^^
Line 5, column 349, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...anguages in year 2000. on the other side , it was increased in year 2010, it was 1...
^^
Line 7, column 19, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[1]
Message: Possible grammatical error. You used a past participle without using any required verb ('be' or 'have'). Did you mean 'saw'?
Suggestion: saw
...2010, it was 15%. In conclusion, we seen from the pie charts they were lots of s...
^^^^
Line 7, column 80, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'spoke', 'spoken'.
Suggestion: spoke; spoken
...rts they were lots of students who were speak spanish language more as compared to al...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 108, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ts who were speak spanish language more as compared to all other languages in the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, moreover, apart from, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 7.0 286% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 5.60731707317 303% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 945.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 210.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80675409584 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27437790634 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 106.607317073 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.390476190476 0.547539520022 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 1.53170731707 718% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.1777813759 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.75 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.75 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 1.69756097561 825% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.316404709825 0.215688989381 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157446816896 0.103423049105 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113425399715 0.0843802449381 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.269095868952 0.15604864568 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0926338917308 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.2329268293 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 8.52 11.4140731707 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.66 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.