The given pie charts illustrated who more active during the bicycle to work or conduct the travel to car there are pie chart divided in 5 item.
Firstly , folks are more able to do hardwork because of exercise on cycling to work there are 30% to maintain our physical activity and less population other side less pursue reason for increase technology lead to more satisfied near the second quadrant. Secondly , ride your bicycles than lower sustained cost of only 12% additionally , faster than driving and no parking issue create appropriate value of are 13% and 15% , opposite view faster than cycling save the time and you can carry on lot of things to work there near the half quadrant . So 11% of safety than bicycle and easily to reached your own beyond work with the certain time limite.
To sum up , many human preferred to travel the car because they are more feature compared to cycle likely security , save time fasted way to go on reached your position.
- The pie chart gives information on UAE government spending in 2000. 61
- An rise number of folks are buying whatt they need online. What are the pros and cons for both individual and companies to shopping online. 53
- The chart bellow shows the percentage of people who ate five portions of fruit and vegetables per day in the UK from 2001 to 2008. 78
- Should animals be used in testing new drugs and procedures? 56
- The chart below show the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Newport city centre from 2003 - 2012. 78
This site is correctly check
This site is correctly check error because you give me a unbelievable band.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 120, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'charts'?
Suggestion: charts
...conduct the travel to car there are pie chart divided in 5 item. Firstly , folks a...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 8, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... pie chart divided in 5 item. Firstly , folks are more able to do hardwork beca...
^^
Line 3, column 98, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...xercise on cycling to work there are 30% to maintain our physical activity and le...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...sfied near the second quadrant. Secondly , ride your bicycles than lower sustained...
^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... sustained cost of only 12% additionally , faster than driving and no parking issu...
^^
Line 3, column 408, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arking issue create appropriate value of are 13% and 15% , opposite view faster t...
^^
Line 3, column 425, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...te appropriate value of are 13% and 15% , opposite view faster than cycling save ...
^^
Line 3, column 547, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ngs to work there near the half quadrant . So 11% of safety than bicycle and easil...
^^
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...th the certain time limite. To sum up , many human preferred to travel the car ...
^^
Line 5, column 13, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun human seems to be countable; consider using: 'many humans'.
Suggestion: many humans
...the certain time limite. To sum up , many human preferred to travel the car because the...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 115, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...eature compared to cycle likely security , save time fasted way to go on reached y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, second, secondly, so, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74404761905 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32715294219 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 106.607317073 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.666666666667 0.547539520022 122% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 33.0 22.4926829268 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.708981042 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 159.4 112.824112599 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 33.6 22.9334400587 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.4 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124164989762 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0723275609698 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525178097676 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0969918156396 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0560435963575 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.44 61.2550243902 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.3012195122 146% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 15.2 10.9970731707 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.