The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts give information about the destination that their UK graduate and postgraduate students who didn’t go into full-time job in the year 2008.
Overall, almost students hope to learn more in the future while there didn’t have a lot people tend to do in the voluntary work. There is a few changes in part-time job and unemployment in two types of students.
First, the place for graduate pupils in 2008 has the highest point in further study. This category takes almost three hundred thousand students who want to learn more in the future. The unpaid job likes voluntary work didn’t take much people, this is the lowest point in the chart just 3.500 students. The people who don’t have a job take approximately one second of the further study. This also takes the same figures of people who do the part-time work.
Second, this second bar chart has some changes. This was a same with the graduate people when this further study category has the highest. Also, the lowest point were voluntary work, this even not reach to the half of thousand. The unemployed take a bit more than 1.500 while the part-time work takes the second highest. The people want to do part-time job just less about 200 students than the further study. This is a lot different from the graduate people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Tran Kim Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | rvw | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagrams below show two cutting tools made from stone They are from an early period and a later period of human history The tools were made by breaking off small pieces of stone Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features an 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The two bar charts below show the proportion of 14 to 16 year old students studying a foreign language in an English speaking country and the top three foreign languages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...id job likes voluntary work didn’t take much people, this is the lowest point in the...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1068.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 224.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76785714286 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35563737096 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486607142857 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 315.9 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.2759892916 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.2857142857 112.824112599 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.42857142857 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158508809083 0.215688989381 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0646021012481 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751298806853 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140284395019 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110093061073 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.0 13.2329268293 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.09 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.76 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.