In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case? What can be done about this problem?
It is true that agriculture are now becoming more advanced, but also many people in all around the world still go hungry. This essay will discuss why this case is happened and have some solution to solve this problem.
First, there have some main problem for this case. While the agriculture are improving a lot in recent years, the thing that some countries have to focus is how much food they will be used for sale in theirs country and how much food will be exported into others. It is mean that their prices for food will increase a lot, that may hard for some individuals to buy the food because the average income wage in some poor countries are too low. Secondly, more immigrant go to rich country to find the better jobs, their country have to face up with the problem that they don’t have enough money to import food so that they can’t serve all of the people in this country. So that more and more people are becoming more hungry.
In my view, there will have some solution to solve this problem. In addition, to solve the problem that the price of some food are to high, some governments need to have some survey to the citizens that how much money they would use to buy their food in a week/month/year. And which food they will have more attention to buy. Their leaders can easy to calculate how much food they would sale for the citizens. The other food will be exported into other country, so that they will solve the problem the food and the price. On top of that, country that don’t have to deal with the problem in immigration can export more food into some crowded country so some dwellers will find it is easy to buy some food. Furthermore, opening some charity events also a good solution to solve it, giving food to some poverty can also reduce the amount of people are facing with hungry. Their country should encourage people to join some charity events such as run competition, sing competion, which can improve more fund to help poor people.
In conclusion, there have some problems why it is the case, but in my opinion, I strongly belive that this solution could help people don’t need to deal with the hungry.
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the unemployment rates in the UK the rest of Europe and Japan from 1993 to 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two bar charts below show the proportion of 14 to 16 year old students studying a foreign language in an English speaking country and the top three foreign languages Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 56
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 632, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...to import food so that they can’t serve all of the people in this country. So that more an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: TO_TOO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
...problem that the price of some food are to high, some governments need to have som...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, it is true, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 7.85571142285 267% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1760.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 390.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.51282051282 5.12529762239 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.18355728559 2.80592935109 78% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412820512821 0.561755894193 73% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 546.3 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7551972112 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.175750788584 0.244688304435 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0872548721849 0.084324248473 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825100078151 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188712296488 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125753752728 0.056905535591 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 12.4159519038 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.89 8.58950901804 80% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 78.4519038076 65% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.