The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
The given charts provide information about what kind of jobs that tertiary-educated students in the UK did after graduating from college in 2008. Overall, the majority of graduates and postgraduates students most likely to continue their study, whereas the least number of jobs in 2009 was voluntary work after leaving college.
To be more precise, the number of graduates students who decided to go for their further studies was the highest, at 29,665. The second opt were leading by the part-time and unemployment among the graduates' students about 17,735 and 16,235 respectively. By contrast, voluntary work had the least number option among the jobs in graduates students, at 3,500.
On the other hand, the most popular option among the postgraduates with 2,725 students chose to continue their study while around 2,500 students decided to work as a part-time worker. Whereas, there were 1,625 students decided not to work after graduating from college and only 345 students selected to be a volunteer.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | pateldhruv1708 | 91 | view |
| 2020-01-18 | Noah1997 | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-07 | pateldhruv1708 | 61 | view |
| 2020-01-06 | trunghn1 | 67 | view |
| 2019-12-26 | Lai Nhu Phuong | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station. 67
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 56
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon. 78
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 86
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 292, Rule ID: LEAST_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'least numb'?
Suggestion: least numb
...y. By contrast, voluntary work had the least number option among the jobs in graduates stud...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
second, whereas, while, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 856.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31677018634 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79034804373 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.9 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.5518064892 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.285714286 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338241841692 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.153834707431 0.103423049105 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0860849256438 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23076601015 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873716343169 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.72 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.