The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work did after leaving college in 2008.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two charts display the intentions of graduate and postgraduate students in the UK after finishing their courses in college in the year 2008.
Overall, while the further study was the section that most of the UK's college-leavers decided to take as their next destination after leaving the institution, voluntary work was the choice that attracted the least interest from these students.
In terms of graduate students, the number of people who decided to upgrade their academic level was recorded as the highest number shown on the chart, with about 29665 individuals. In contrast, the figure for voluntary work stood at only 3500, making it the least attractive section among all categories. The second popular choice was placed to a part-time job with the figure at around 17735. There were about 16255 graduate students in the UK recorded to be in the state if unemployment in 2008.
A similar pattern can be found in the chart for postgraduates as the most popular thing that postgraduate students would like to take was to seek for further study, the figure for this purpose was at 2725. Followed by part-time work, its figure stood at approximately 2536, rewarding it the second place on the given chart. On the other hand, voluntary work still kept its bottom place when receiving only 345 students' choices. It was recorded that there were about 1625 postgraduates in the UK couldn't find a job after leaving college in 2008.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-03 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | tr_h.20 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Tran Kim Ngoc Anh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-14 | rvw | 78 | view |
| 2023-03-29 | quan12341234 | 73 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere Do you think this is a positive or negative problem 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 495, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...were about 1625 postgraduates in the UK couldnt find a job after leaving college in 200...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, still, while, as to, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 241.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96680497925 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67242467026 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 127.0 106.607317073 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.526970954357 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 354.6 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2053938891 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.7 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20336751096 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0928450191947 0.103423049105 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0605518129634 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146625556731 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533587210954 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.