The charts below shows about government's spending on culture and education in 1915 and 2005, and the number of people participating in arts events in the same years.
The charts below shows about government's spending on culture and education in 1915 and 2005, and also describing about the number of people participating in arts events in the same years. Overall, as illustrated in the charts that the highest government's spending was in theatre, while the lowest spending was in visual arts, and for the number of people participating in arts events, the highest portion of visitors was in music while the lowest portion of visitors was in virtual art.
In pie charts of government's expenditure, it was known that theatre portion of spending which used to be taking more that one-fourth of the total spending was increase significantly and become one-third of it. Similiar increase also happened also happened in literature aspect, even though did not change significantly as theatre. While for music and virtual art aspect experienced a reduction in government's spending allocation. Music aspect that used to take half of the amount of expenditures in 2005 went down and became one-third of total expenditures. Meanwhile visual art expenditures did not change a lot in a decade.
For the number of people participating in arts events diagram, it was known that people interest to attend music shows or events are increase from 1995 that more or less 115.000 visitors, became 150.000 visitors in 2015, if it calculated the changes for about 35.000 visitors. Another arts events that also experienced increase on the amount of the attenders are in theatre and literatur, with the changes in a decade of the number of visitors or attenders more or less than 20.000 and 5.000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-16 | Arman Mansyur | 67 | view |
- The charts below show one government's spending on culture and education in 1995 and 2005 and the number of people participating in arts events in the same years. 67
- The charts below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 56
- The pie chart below describe about the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 56
- The number of people who are at risk of serious health problems due to being overweight is increasing. what is the reason for the growth in overweight people in society? How can this problem be solved? 84
- The pie charts below describe about the average of household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 229, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'also happened'.
Suggestion: also happened
...come one-third of it. Similiar increase also happened also happened in literature aspect, even though did n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 559, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...became one-third of total expenditures. Meanwhile visual art expenditures did not change ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, third, while, more or less
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1353.0 965.302439024 140% => OK
No of words: 264.0 196.424390244 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.125 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83600334007 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.42803030303 0.547539520022 78% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 410.4 283.868780488 145% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 75.2949754853 43.030603864 175% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.333333333 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.44444444444 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.372841122934 0.215688989381 173% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.173375940981 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.243983682914 0.0843802449381 289% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.262616967115 0.15604864568 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.180997706217 0.0819641961636 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.2329268293 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.07 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.